Affiliate Disclosure: Some of the links on this page are affiliate links, which means we may receive a commission if you decide to buy a product or service we recommend.

Since the infamous January 6th incident in 2021, a barrage of legal indictments has been thrown at Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States. The latest pondering is whether or not Trump is eligible to run for reelection under the 14th Amendment.

Ballot Battles in Denver

Christopher Halloran // Shutterstock.

The first challenge arose recently in Denver when politicians sought to exclude Donald Trump from Colorado’s primary ballot.

14th Amendment in Focus

Sean Pavone // Shutterstock

Now, Michigan and New Hampshire have joined in, examining the 14th Amendment thoroughly to see if there are potential barriers to Trump being on the ballot.

Section 3 Revisited

Evan El-Amin // Shutterstock

With the 14th Amendment a hot topic, many wonder what it means and how it’s being used against the former President. In essence, Trump’s opponents refer to Section 3, which could potentially disqualify Trump for engaging in rebellion against the United States — referring to the January 6th incident.

Historical Context

Straight 8 Photography // Shutterstock

Although Section 3 was long forgotten after the Civil War era, the January 6th Capitol Riot sparked a new look into the Amendment.

Post-Capitol Riot Examination

Frederic Legrand – COMEO // Shutterstock.

The argument is that the former President assembled a mob to storm the Capitol with claims about a stolen election. Not only that, but he urged his followers to stop Joe Biden’s election from being certified. The indictments also mention that at no point did Trump try to stop the riot. Whether these accusations should disqualify Trump from running is up for debate.

Debate Over Eligibility

Rommel Canlas // Shutterstock.

It’s important to note that no election authorities have declared Trump ineligible at this point.

Legal Complexities

Inside Creative House // Shutterstock.

However, many individuals are looking closely at the legal requirements for the presidency, including the New Hampshire Republican Secretary and Maine’s secretary of state. There is discussion amongst officials in several other states, including Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.

Trump’s Defense

Roman Samborskyi // Shutterstock.

There has been some notable pushback against these allegations. Trump and several legal scholars, including Harvard law professor Noah Feldman, have voiced their doubts about these claims impacting eligibility. 

Partisan Concerns

Evan El-Amin // Shutterstock.

Three main issues arise with Section 3. Firstly, there is uncertainty about whether state election authorities can enforce it. The other issue is whether or not Section 3 can even be applied to a former President of the United States. Finally, there is the issue of whether or not Trump did, indeed, violate Section 3.

Freedom of Choice

Stokkete // Shutterstock.

Others have voiced their concerns about opening the door for partisan abuse should Section 3 determine Trump ineligible to run for the presidency. One secretary of state even claimed it would be un-American not to give citizens the freedom to choose who they want to be the next President.



Pin It